← Back to Blogs

Understanding the Architecture of Flow VLAs

A Visual Guide to π0 and π0.5 Model Architectures
Tonghe Zhang
October, 2025

Abstract

This post provides detailed architectural visualizations of Flow Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, specifically π0 and π0.5. These diagrams illustrate the key components, data flow, and structural differences between these two state-of-the-art models that combine vision, language, and action spaces for robotic control. Understanding these architectures is crucial for researchers and practitioners working on embodied AI and robot learning.

Introduction

Flow-based Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models represent a significant advancement in embodied AI, enabling robots to process multimodal inputs and generate actions in a continuous, flow-based manner. The π0 and π0.5 models are prominent examples of this architecture, each with distinct design choices that affect their performance and capabilities.

These architectures leverage flow matching techniques to model action distributions, combining visual encoders, language models, and action decoders in a unified framework. Below, we present detailed architectural diagrams for both models, highlighting their structural components and information flow.

π0 Architecture

The π0 model represents the foundational architecture for flow-based VLAs. This diagram illustrates how the model processes visual observations and language instructions to generate robot actions through a flow matching process.

π0 Model Architecture Diagram

Key components of the π0 architecture include:

π0.5 Architecture

The π0.5 model builds upon π0 with architectural refinements and enhancements. This improved version incorporates lessons learned from the original design, offering better performance and efficiency.

π0.5 Model Architecture Diagram

The π0.5 architecture introduces several improvements:

Comparing π0 and π0.5

While both models share the fundamental principle of flow-based action generation, π0.5 introduces several key innovations:

Architectural Differences

Performance Implications

These architectural differences translate to tangible improvements in robot learning scenarios. π0.5 demonstrates better sample efficiency, improved generalization to novel scenarios, and more robust performance across diverse tasks. The enhanced vision-language fusion particularly benefits tasks requiring fine-grained understanding of spatial relationships and object manipulations.

Applications and Use Cases

Flow VLA architectures like π0 and π0.5 are particularly well-suited for:

Conclusion

Understanding the architecture of flow-based VLA models is essential for advancing embodied AI research. The π0 and π0.5 architectures demonstrate how careful design of vision-language-action pipelines can lead to powerful and flexible robot learning systems. By visualizing these architectures, we hope to facilitate further research and development in this exciting area.

For more information on flow-based robot learning and reinforcement learning with flow policies, check out my work on ReinFlow and the mathematical foundations of diffusion and flow models.